Doug SawyerDougSawyer

Burkhart Resources v. Arthrex (Florida Court of Appeals, Second District). Represented Arthrex, a medical device company, in a royalties dispute against Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D. and his entity, Burkhart Resource Limited Partnership.

Kraft Heinz Foods v. Golden State Foods (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware). Representing Kraft in a trade secrets dispute against its competitor, Golden State.

Direct Supply v. Park Supply of America (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin). Represented Direct Supply in a trademark infringement dispute against Park Supply.

TriQuint Semiconductor v. Avago Technologies et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona). Represented TriQuint Semiconductor, a manufacturer of high-performance RF solutions used in wireless communications, in a patent, antitrust and trade secret case involving Bulk Acoustic Wave technology.

Norman International et al. v. Hunter Douglas et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado). Representing Norman in a competitor action involving cordless window covering technology.

Norman International v. Hunter Douglas et al. Represented Norman International in inter partes review proceedings.

Realtime Data v. Code42 Software (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado). Represented Code42 in a patent infringement action involving data compression technology.

Realtime Data v. Savvis Communications et al. (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas). Represented Savvis Communications in a patent infringement action involving data compression technology.

Gates v. Optibelt (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Representing Gates in a competitor action involving polyurea-urethane cord treatment technology.

Eppendorf AG et al. v. Nanosphere (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware). Represented Nanosphere against Eppendorf in suit for infringement of patent relating to detecting and quantifying target compounds captured by an array on a solid surface.

Microsoft v. Phoenix Solutions (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California). Fifteen patent declaratory relief actions concerning speech recognition and natural language processing.

Riddell v. Schutt Sports (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin). Obtained a $30 million verdict for Riddell in a patent infringement case directed to protective technology in football helmets.

Wilson Sporting Goods v. Easton Sports (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Successfully represented Easton Sports in patent infringement case, involving claims and counterclaims, directed to baseball bat technology.

Everything Baseball v. Wilson Sporting Goods (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Successfully defended Easton Sports in a patent infringement case directed to chest protector technology.

Gold Medal Products v. C. Cretors & Co. (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky). Represented Defendant Cretors, a popcorn machine manufacturer, in a case alleging false advertising and patent infringement.