Allan M. SoobertAllan M.Soobert

Defendants Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. in patent litigation in the Northern District of Illinois involving automated securities trading systems.

Respondent Black & Decker in proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission concerning power tools.

Defendant Ericsson Inc. in patent litigation in the Northern District of Texas involving cellular telephones.

Defendant GlobalFoundries in patent litigation in the Western District of Texas involving leading-edge transistor technology.

Defendant Greenway Medical in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas involving various medical claims auditing software.

Defendant Lehman Brothers, Inc. in patent litigation in the Northern District of Illinois involving automated trading systems.

Defendant Mova Corp. in pharmaceutical patent litigation. See Upjohn v. Mova, 31 F. Supp. 2d 211 (D.P.R. 1997) (jury verdict in favor of client Mova).

Respondent Novo Nordisk A/S in unfair importation (Section 337) proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission involving human growth hormone.

Defendant Oshkosh Truck Corp. in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas involving online parts ordering systems.

Defendant PayPal Inc. in patent litigation in the District of Delaware involving payment technology.

Defendant Research In Motion (Blackberry) in patent litigation in the Middle District of Florida involving various smartphone features and functionality.

Defendant Research In Motion (Blackberry) in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas involving various smartphone features and functionality.

Defendant Samsung Electronics in patent and trade secret litigation in the Northern District of California involving augmented reality technology.

Defendant Samsung Electronics in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas involving semiconductor devices and structures.

Defendant Samsung Electronics in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas involving memory architecture and related functionality in mobile devices.

Defendant Samsung Electronics in patent litigation in the District of Delaware involving memory device fabrication and architecture.

Plaintiff Sandvik AB in patent litigation involving power tools. See Sandvik AB v. E.J. Co., 121 F.3d 669 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (ruling in favor of client Sandvik).

Defendant Shuffle Master, Inc. in the Southern District of Mississippi involving antitrust and patent infringement allegations.

Respondent Tekon Electronics in unfair importation (Section 337) proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission involving electrical connectors.

Defendants UBS AG and UBS Financial Services, Inc. in patent litigation in the Northern District of Illinois involving automated securities trading systems.

Defendant ViewSonic Corp. in patent litigation in the Eastern District of Virginia involving wireless flat-panel displays.

Lawdragon

Law & Politics

Legal 500

Intellectual Asset Magazine (IAM)

DC Magazine