Lisa NguyenLisaNguyen

Meta Platforms and Instagram in connection with representation as lead counsel in two litigations brought by Street Spirit involving multiple patents related to identity verifications. The Court granted dismissal with prejudice based on § 101 less than two weeks after oral argument. Plaintiff chose not to appeal [Street Spirit v. Meta Platforms (N.D. Cal.); Spirit Spirit v. Instagram (N.D. Cal.)]

Hon Hai in connection with representation as lead counsel in a 13 patent case asserted by Bell Northern Research. After filing a motion for lack of personal jurisdiction, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case. [Bell Northern Research v. Hon Hai (S.D. Fla.)]

ResMed in connection with representation as lead counsel in seven IPRs against NYU involving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines. Successfully obtained final written decisions finding all challenged claims unpatentable, invalidating over 140 claims across seven patents. [ResMed v. NYU (PTAB)]

Niantic in connection with representation as lead counsel in a lawsuit brought by Flick Intelligence alleging infringement by Pokemon Go. Successfully obtained dismissal based on § 101. [Flick Intelligence v. Niantic (N.D. Cal.)]

Meta Platforms and WhatsApp in connection with representation as lead counsel in IPRs against Wrinkl involving messaging technology. Successfully obtained final written decisions finding all challenged claims unpatentable. Patent Owner chose not to appeal. [Meta Platforms v. Wrinkl (PTAB)]

Symantec and Veritas in connection with representation as co-lead counsel in a second lawsuit brought by IV alleging infringement of three patents. By the completion of summary judgment briefing, only two claims of one patent remained. Successfully obtained summary judgment of both non-infringement and invalidity based on § 101. [Intellectual Ventures v. Symantec (D. Del.)]

NVIDIA in connection with defense in an eight-patent suit involving various semiconductor technologies, including fabrication, memory controllers, and SDRAMs. By the time of trial, only three patents remained. The judge declared a mistrial as to two patents, and the jury found the remaining patent not infringed. [Samsung Electronics. v. NVIDIA Corporation (E.D. Va.)]

LSI defended against assertion of 12 patents by competitor Altera and represented LSI offensively in assertion of 12 additional patents in responsive counterclaims. The case settled after infringement contentions were served. [Altera v. LSI (C.D. Cal.)]

Jaguar Land Rover in connection with a patent litigation involving instrument clusters. Successfully obtained summary judgment of invalidity and award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The Federal Circuit summarily affirmed both decisions. [Vehicle Interface Technologies v. Jaguar Land Rover (D. Del.; Fed. Cir.)]

Symantec in connection with a second lawsuit brought by Uniloc involving software activation and anti-piracy software. Obtained favorable settlement for Symantec prior to claim construction. [Uniloc USA. v. Symantec (E.D. Tex.)]

GEICO in connection with a patent litigation involving mobile applications. The case resulted in a walk away by the plaintiff months before trial. [MacroSolve, Inc. v. GEICO (E.D. Tex.)]

Tropos Networks in connection with a patent litigation involving two patents related to mesh networking. Although the case had been pending for more than seven years, obtained a stay pending inter partes reexamination. The case settled on favorable terms during the stay. [IP Co., LLC v. Tropos Networks, Inc. (N.D. Ga.)]

Linvatec in connection with a patent litigation involving nine patents related to suture anchors. Successfully ran the table on claim construction issues on all patents to obtain a favorable settlement shortly after the claim construction order issued. [Bonutti Skeletal Innovations v. Linvatec Corporation (M.D. Fla.)]

Honda in connection with a patent litigation brought by Intellectual Ventures related to electric motors, successfully obtaining an initial determination of no violation after a one-week trial. [In the Matter of Certain Thermoplastic-Encapsulated Electric Motors, Components Thereof, and Products and Vehicles Containing Same II]

AU Optronics in connection with a patent litigation brought by Thomson involving multiple patents related to LCD panels and semiconductor devices. After a one-week trial, the Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination, finding that AU Optronics did not infringe any of Thomson’s patents, and invalidating most of the asserted claims. The finding of no violation was upheld by the Commission. [In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, And Modules, And Components Thereof]

Patexia

IAM Patent 1000

Managing IP

PTAB Bar Association

Daily Journal

Silicon Valley Business Journal

Diversity Journal

Northern California Super Lawyers