
Naveen ModiNaveenModi
Partner, Intellectual Property
Naveen Modi is the co-chair of the Intellectual Property Practice at Paul Hastings, overseeing the firm’s Global Intellectual Property practice consisting of more than 100 attorneys.
Naveen’s practice covers all aspects of high stakes IP-related legal work, including litigation before federal district courts, the U.S. International Trade Commission and federal appeals courts; post-grant proceedings, interferences and derivation proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); arbitrations; and due diligence and client counseling. He has led “bet-the-company cases” involving patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyright issues. He has represented both companies accused of infringement and those whose IP has been infringed in a wide range of technical areas, including electronics, software, business methods, medical devices, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology.
Representation of a variety of companies in IP matters over the years, including Acorda, Applied Materials, Alkermes, AT&T, Boeing, Boehringer Ingelheim, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Boston Scientific, Capital One, Canon, Chevron, Corelogic, Daiichi Sankyo, eBay, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Fitbit, Google, Helsinn, HTC, Illumina, Insys, JSR, L''Oréal, Medtronic, Merck, Mitek, Opinion Lab, PayPal, Samsung, SAP, Snap, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), TikTok, Uber, Walgreen, Wintek and Zimmer Biomet.
Representation of Google in numerous post-grant proceedings, including inter partes review and post-grant review.
- Band 1 – Intellectual Property: Litigation, District of Columbia
Chambers USA
- Band 1 – Intellectual Property: Patent Prosecution, District of Columbia
Chambers USA
“The Increasing Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession, Especially in Today’s Challenging Times,” Intellectual Property Magazine, Co-Author
APRIL 28, 2020
“Use of PTAB Decisions in District Court Litigation,” IPWatchdog, Author
SEPTEMBER 18, 2016
“Five Years In: The AIA’s Effects on Patent Litigation (Perspective),” Bloomberg BNA Big Law Business, Co-Author
SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
“Some Federal Circuit Guidance on Procedural Safeguards for PTAB,” Law360, Co-Author
JUNE 30, 2016
“Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on the APA’s Procedural Safeguards for PTAB Proceedings,” Lexology, Co-Author
JUNE 16, 2016
“PTAB Provides Guidance on AIA Estoppel Provisions,” Managing Intellectual Property, Co-Author
OCTOBER 28, 2015
“Quick Fixes Implemented, New Rules on the Way for PTAB Trial Practice,” Lexology, Co-Author
APRIL 1, 2015
“Fifteen Months of Contested Proceedings Under the America Invents Act: Lessons Learned,” BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, Co-Author
FEBRUARY 7, 2014
“Mechanisms and Strategies for Challenging Patents at the USPTO in the Wake of the America Invents Act,” Intellectual Property Today, Co-Author
April 2012
Member
Advisory Council, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Member
GW’s IP Advisory Council (IPAC)
- “Berkeley/GW Law Roundtable on the Recent USPTO Post-Grant Rules Package,” SpeakerJUNE 6, 2023
- “Patent Litigation Variation: The PTAB vs. ITC vs. District Court,” IPWatchdog Studios Patent Litigation Masters, Ashburn, VA, SpeakerMAY 16, 2023