Navi Singh Dhillon

Defended a public company in mass toxic tort action involving more than 50 individual lawsuits and 24,000 named plaintiffs related to alleged injuries from an environmental event.
Defended a recycling company in mass toxic tort litigation involving more than 1,000 named plaintiffs.
Defended a public company in enforcement action brought by California Attorney General for alleged violations of water pollution laws.
Defended a public company in enforcement action brought by Los Angeles County relating to alleged public nuisance and environmental claims.
Defended a private company in connection with regulatory dispute relating to ownership of more than 1.5 million acres of timberlands.
Defended a public company in nationwide litigation relating to alleged violations of environmental laws (e.g., RCRA) concerning telecommunications infrastructure.
Represented an asset manager in plaintiff-side lawsuit for alleged fraud relating to joint venture involving development of large-scale project.
Advised a client in the development of the world’s largest battery-energy storage system (BESS).
Defended public company in class action concerning Automatic Renewal Laws.
Represented a developer in connection with new, net-zero sustainable town.
Represented a federally recognized Indian tribe in high-profile litigation concerning proposed casino development and challenge to validity of the California Governor’s concurrence for the project.
Defended a cryptocurrency exchange in $100 million dispute related to contract and corporate governance dispute.
Defended a public company in $17 million government enforcement action in administrative proceedings for alleged violations of federal and state laws concerning alleged water pollution.
Represented an aerospace company in connection with hostile takeover of entity supplying critical parts for airplane manufacturing.
Defended renewable companies in lawsuits challenging a 3,500 MW solar projects.
Defended a timber company in multiple lawsuits under the Endangered Species Act.
Represented a hedge fund (largest institutional investor) in Delaware appraisal litigation involving $15 billion go-private transaction.
Represented a Canadian supplier in connection with North American contract negotiations involving mass-timber supply contracts for new, sustainable corporate campuses (e.g., Google, Microsoft).
Defended one of the largest landowners in the United States in connection with Timber Harvest Plan disputes.
Advised a client in connection with development of 800-MW renewable energy project with associated battery storage.
Defended a municipality in lawsuit involving development of casino and claim for more than $750 million in damages.
Defended a client in lawsuit challenging development of utility-scale desalination facility.
Defended a leading natural resources company in lawsuit alleging timber-harvesting activities across more than 300,000 acres will result in unlawful take.
Represented two hedge funds in a plaintiff-side fraud suit in the Southern District of New York against Greek shipping company.
Advised a developer in securing critical regulatory approvals for a state-of-the-art marina near Stanford University and entitlements for new hotel on the San Francisco Bay.
Represented a county and landowner in connection with public nuisance and air pollution lawsuits involving a 900-acre rock quarry located in Napa County.
Represented a developer in multiple land use lawsuits against the City of Berkeley involving takings challenges to monetary exactions.
Represented a client in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States Department of the Interior that resulted in termination of a federal rulemaking process.
Defended global wine companies in a tort and contract lawsuit involving California vineyard and cutting-edge viticulture practices.
Advised a client in connection with development and defense of regulatory program for “commuter shuttle buses” to facilitate sustainable transportation of technology employees located in San Francisco Bay Area.
Represented a water district with nearly 2,000 miles of pipelines in connection with Clean Water Act lawsuit in Southern California.
Represented a developer in connection with preliminary injunction proceedings in federal and state court initiated by environmental groups seeking to block construction of utility-scale solar project.
Represented a leading rooftop solar energy companies in lawsuit challenging decision of Nevada Public Utilities Commission to curb a “net metering” program.
Represented more than 30 companies, including industry-leading cosmetics brands, in Proposition 65 involving titanium dioxide (airborne, unbound particles of respirable size).
Represented an organization in multiple mandamus lawsuits seeking to block construction at the historic Sharp Park Golf Course.
Represented a developer in its California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuit brought by environmental groups to block construction of a 247-MW solar photovoltaic facility.
Represented an organization in its lawsuit against National Park Service for approving a large-scale project without first complying with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act.

Chambers USA
“Trailblazer,”
The National Law Journal
Top 40 Under 40
The Daily Journal
Regulatory
Legal 500
Litigation, Legal
500
Lawdragon 500
“Rising Star,”
Law 360

Complex Litigation

Environment & Energy

Securities Litigation

Energy & Infrastructure

Land Use

Navi Singh DhillonNavi SinghDhillon

REPRESENTATIONS

RECOGNITIONS

Chambers USA

The National Law Journal

The Daily Journal

Legal 500

500

Lawdragon 500

Law 360

PRACTICE AREAS

SECTORS