Representative Complex Litigation and Class Action Matters:
- Won a dismissal and successfully resolved a federal data breach suit against a healthcare information technology company under the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (“CMIA”).
- Led a team that obtained summary judgment in favor of an investment advisor in a significant ERISA class action involving claims of excessive fees, failures to disclose, and breach of fiduciary duties, eliminating all but one minor claim which was later dismissed by the plaintiff. Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp., Fremont Investment Advisors, Inc., et al., 590 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (Nov. 3, 2008).
- Served as co-lead trial counsel with a multi-disciplinary team in a product liability failure to warn case. The trial resulted in a jury verdict win for the client, an automotive insulation manufacturer, for $122 million. CTA Acoustics, Inc., v. Borden Chemical, Inc. (Circuit Court, Kentucky, May 21, 2007).
- Defended a large health care company in a class action in California state court claiming unfair competition and false advertising. Ms. Carter and her team successfully obtained rulings decertifying a class of over 1 million putative class members, and striking all claims for monetary relief against the client, leading to final resolution of all claims.
- Represented a hedge fund manager in conducting an internal investigation and responding to a government inquiry from a foreign securities regulator relating to alleged inappropriate trading activities involving foreign securities.
- Represented a hedge fund and its chief investment officer in an insider trading investigation.
- Defended a corporate officer sued in over 50 consolidated federal securities class actions arising out of the merger of a healthcare products manufacturer and a medical software company in federal securities class, in ERISA-related follow-on actions, and in state securities law actions.
- Represented a corporate client as part of a team in multi-party federal litigation involving billion-dollar claims filed as an outgrowth of the Orange County bankruptcy, in which the First Amendment status of published debt ratings was confirmed. The case was later resolved for a nominal sum equivalent to the return of the fees paid by Orange County to the client. In re County of Orange and related cases, United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. SACV 96-0765 (1999).
Representative Insurance Coverage Matters:
- Ms. Carter has extensive experience in resolving complex insurance coverage disputes. Her experience includes taking the leading role in negotiation of multi-party settlements involving directors and officers (D&O), errors and omissions (E&O), fidelity coverage, fiduciary liability, environmental, toxic tort, construction defect, product liability, business interruption, advertising injury, and numerous other types of insurance coverage.
- In addition to her co-lead role at trial in CTA Acoustics, Inc., v. Borden Chemical, Inc. (Circuit Court, Kentucky, May 21, 2007), Ms. Carter led the team in a successful effort to business interruption and property damage coverage for the $120 million loss incurred by the client manufacturer.
- Other recent representations include leading a construction products company’s successful recovery of multi-million dollar losses in a governmental investigation, spearheading a foreign manufacturer’s effort to recoup losses for trade secret proceedings, and obtaining a manufacturer’s full reimbursement for large losses incurred under a fidelity policy.
- She also has extensive experience in advising boards and company management and conducting negotiations with insurers on D&O, E&O and other coverages.
Speaking Engagements and Publications
Ms. Carter has written and spoken on commercial litigation, investment management liabilities, securities litigation, and insurance coverage. Selected publications as author or co-author include:
- Retailers in California Face New Scrutiny in Light of Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. (published in Financial Fraud Law Report, A. S. Pratt & Sons, May 2011).
- Supreme Court to Review Direct Liability of Investment Advisor for Prospectus Disclosure (Stay Current Paul Hastings Client Alert August 2010) (on Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders decision).
- South Cherry Street, LLC v. Hennessee Group LLC: Investment Advisor Not Liable For Securities Fraud In Recommending Hedge Fund That Was Part Of A Ponzi Scheme (August 2009 Client Alert).
- Selective Waiver Falls Again: The 10th Circuit’s Decision in Qwest Communications (published in White Collar Crime, Andrews Litigation Reporter, October 2006).
- In addition, Ms. Carter and other members of the Securities Litigation Practice Group co-authored Securities Litigation: A Practical Guide (Oceana 2004), a book designed for general counsel.