Patent Litigation

• Solutex N.A. v. Designs for Health and KD Pharma Bexbach (U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida). Represented Solutex in a patent infringement action involving novel fish oil fractionates containing specialized pro-resolving mediators and their precursors.
• Transocean Sedco Forex Ventures v. The Oilgear Company (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas). Represented Oilgear in a patent infringement action involving accumulators in the subsea systems.
• Lone Star SCM v. Honeywell International (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas). Represented Honeywell in a patent infringement action involving radio frequency identification (RFID) technology.
• Crow Hill v. Big Agnes (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado). Represented Big Agnes in a patent infringement action involving collapsible chair design.
• Zebra Technologies Corporation et al. v. Intermec et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Represented Intermec (which was acquired by Honeywell) in a 20-patent case relating to scanner, printer, RFID and battery technologies.
• Alien Technology v. Intermec, Intermec IP, Intermec Technologies (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Representing Intermec in a patent infringement action involving a system for reading and writing data from and onto remote tags.
• Netfuel v. F5 Networks (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Representing F5 Networks in a patent infringement action involving managing computer network resources.
• Upaid Systems. v. Card Concepts (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Representing Card Concepts in a patent infringement action involving enhanced communication platform and related communication method using the platform.

• TriQuint Semiconductor v. Avago Technologies et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona). Represented TriQuint Semiconductor, a manufacturer of high-performance RF solutions used in wireless communications, in a patent, antitrust and trade secret case involving Bulk Acoustic Wave technology.
• Norman International et al. v. Hunter Douglas et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado). Representing Norman in a competitor action involving cordless window covering technology.
• Norman International v. Hunter Douglas et al. Represented Norman International in inter partes review proceedings.
• Realtime Data v. Code42 Software (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado). Represented Code42 in a patent infringement action involving data compression technology.
• Realtime Data v. Savvis Communications et al. (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas). Represented Savvis Communications in a patent infringement action involving data compression technology.
• Gates v. Optibelt (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Representing Gates in a competitor action involving polyurea-urethane cord treatment technology.
• Eppendorf AG et al. v. Nanosphere (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware). Represented Nanosphere against Eppendorf in suit for infringement of patent relating to detecting and quantifying target compounds captured by an array on a solid surface.
• Microsoft v. Phoenix Solutions (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California). Fifteen patent declaratory relief actions concerning speech recognition and natural language processing.
• Riddell v. Schutt Sports (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin). Obtained a $30 million verdict for Riddell in a patent infringement case directed to protective technology in football helmets.
• Wilson Sporting Goods v. Easton Sports (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Successfully represented Easton Sports in patent infringement case, involving claims and counterclaims, directed to baseball bat technology.
• Everything Baseball v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). Successfully defended Easton Sports in a patent infringement case directed to chest protector technology.
• Gold Medal Products v. C. Cretors & Co. (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky). Represented Defendant Cretors, a popcorn machine manufacturer, in a case alleging false advertising and patent infringement.

Intellectual Property Litigation

• Burkhart Resources v. Arthrex (Florida Court of Appeals, Second District). Represented Arthrex, a medical device company, in a royalties dispute against Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D. and his entity, Burkhart Resource Limited Partnership.
• Kraft Heinz Foods v. Golden State Foods (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware). Representing Kraft in a trade secrets dispute against its competitor, Golden State.
• Direct Supply v. Park Supply of America (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin). Represented Direct Supply in a trademark infringement dispute against Park Supply.